Looking back at the 2017 NBA playoffs, I still get chills thinking about how unpredictable that postseason truly was. As someone who’s spent years analyzing basketball statistics and playoff odds, I can confidently say that season was one of the most fascinating in recent memory—not just because of the star power, but because of the sheer number of teams that genuinely seemed to have a shot at the title. I remember poring over the odds from various sportsbooks and advanced metrics models in early April, trying to piece together which team had the clearest path to the championship. The Warriors, of course, were the heavy favorites—but as any seasoned fan knows, the playoffs have a way of humbling even the most dominant squads.
Golden State entered the postseason with what felt like an almost unfair level of talent. With Kevin Durant now fully integrated into their system, their offensive rating was hovering around 115.4, and their net rating was a staggering +12.1. According to most prediction models, their championship probability sat somewhere between 65% and 72%. I’ll admit—I thought they were closer to 80%. They had the depth, the coaching, and the experience. But what stood out to me then, and still does now, was how much variance exists in a seven-game series. One injury, one cold shooting night, or one breakout performance from an opponent can tilt everything. That’s why I never fully bought into the idea that the Warriors were a lock, even if the numbers said otherwise.
The Cavaliers, on the other hand, were a fascinating case. LeBron James was in his 14th season and still playing at an otherworldly level. Cleveland’s odds fluctuated throughout the year, but by playoff time, most models gave them around a 15–18% chance to repeat. I thought that was a little generous, honestly. Their defense was suspect—they ranked 22nd in defensive efficiency after the All-Star break—and they leaned so heavily on LeBron and Kyrie Irving. Still, when you have the best player in the world, you can’t be counted out. I remember telling friends at the time that if anyone could disrupt Golden State’s march to the title, it was Cleveland, purely because of LeBron’s ability to elevate in high-stakes moments.
Then there were the dark horses. The San Antonio Spurs, with Kawhi Leonard emerging as a two-way superstar, were given around a 7–9% chance by most analysts. I thought they were being slightly undervalued. Gregg Popovich’s system, combined with Leonard’s ascendance, made them a nightmare matchup for almost anyone. The Houston Rockets, led by James Harden and Mike D’Antoni’s offensive revolution, were also intriguing. Their three-point-heavy style gave them a puncher’s chance in any series, and their odds sat around 4–5%. I’ve always had a soft spot for teams that challenge conventional wisdom, and Houston’s “Moreyball” approach was exactly that.
What’s interesting is how these high-stakes dynamics mirror other competitive environments—like professional volleyball, for instance. I was recently watching a recap of a match where former Flying Titan Caitlin Viray fired two clutch attacks before Trisha Tubu put the match away in a nip-and-tuck four-set contest. That kind of momentum shift—where a single player steps up in critical moments—is exactly what we see in the NBA playoffs. It’s not always the team with the best overall roster that wins; sometimes, it’s the one with the player who refuses to lose. In that sense, teams like the Cavaliers, who had LeBron, or the Spurs, who had Kawhi, carried a kind of intangible edge that isn’t always captured by the odds.
When I reflect on the actual playoff run, it’s hard not to marvel at how things played out. The Warriors bulldozed their way through the West, going 12–0 before the Finals. The Cavaliers, meanwhile, had a slightly rockier path but still dominated the East behind historic performances from LeBron. And then, of course, the Finals delivered one of the most dramatic endings in recent history. Golden State ultimately secured the title, but it wasn’t the straightforward coronation many expected. The Cavaliers pushed them, and for stretches, it looked like we might witness a repeat of 2016.
In the end, the numbers told part of the story—but not all of it. The Warriors’ championship probability may have been sky-high, but the playoffs reminded us why we watch the games instead of simulating them. Upsets, injuries, and individual brilliance all play a role. As an analyst, I’ve learned to balance statistical models with the understanding that sports are deeply human endeavors. The 2017 playoffs, much like that volleyball match I mentioned earlier, showed that under pressure, the difference between winning and losing often comes down to who wants it more—and who can deliver when it matters most.
Argentina World CupCopyrights